I was going to call this post Et Tu Anne Jackson?.
You see, I’m worried about the trend of Christian technocrati who are slowly getting over the techno-hysteria of early social media adoption and are willing to commit the heresy of ‘fessing up to the fact that … shock … real, face-to-face community is better. And social media saturation can be damaging to your health.
We’ve had a blogatical. Social networking fasts like Anne’s. And any number of confessions from B-list bloggers like me who, at varying points on their journeys, find that trying to maintain a social media “brand” on several platforms takes the kind of determined emotional, creative and intellectual effort few of us can muster without damaging other, more important parts of our lives.
So why am i bothered?
Because many of us will — and maybe should — retrench to more modest social media exposure and more humble social media expectations.
So why am I bothered?
Because that means we might not get the opportunity to push through the pain barrier to discover how Christians can successfully develop a community praxis in the online world. And we’re not going to learn that from how people network about their favorite shows on Hulu. We’re going to learn that from trying to plant churches, faith communities, there.
One of the things that I think we, the evangelical techno elite in the North American church, keep fatally forgetting is that we are totally surrounded by Christians and Christ-friendly if not Christ-affirming values. The magnitude and the richness of our real-world Christian community is rarely available to anyone else in the world.
As a pastor of what is already, after three weeks! a global community of believers, I have already had my heart broken by the reality that your faith, your ability to live it out and your capacity to survive the lies, deceptions and temptations of the enemy, is tied to having a supportive Christian community around you.
And how many places in techno-advanced Western Europe, let alone the rest of the world, have large concentrations of committed, faithful, theologically orthodox believers?
Not many.
How do you answer a Christian in Germany who is told of the importance of marriage that is part of God’s plan who doesn’t know many or any Proverbs 31 women? Heck, NewSpring has 10,000 attenders in one more or less contiguous geographic community and we get that complaint.
Missionary dating isn’t the answer. And neither is the cute response that each individual Christian should become a micro-church planter.
Yes. Offline community IS better. But online community is infinitely better than nothing at all.
I believe in God’s plan for developing Christian community. It’s called “go forth and multiply.”
But the remnant we have become has to finds a way to build tight, integrated supportive communities — good soil as it were — for real saving faith and contagious faith to flourish.
Would they look like Holy Huddles? Was the Acts church a Holy Huddle? It grew by thousands daily.
Debates about online community aren’t interesting experiments with marketing and promotions around the edges of a church movement. It is the future of a church movement.
Agree or disagree?
Filed under: ruminations




Recent Comments